Am I the "problem" or "victim"?
[The quotation marks *ARE* semantically significant ;]
I have been following recent thread on
mozilla-support-thunderbird with subject line "Thunderbird
Extremely Slow and Pegging CPU". There have been references to
several Thunderbird specific articles on kb.mozillazine.org .
Mozillazine articles frequently are targeted at a specific
product but have an introductory sentence/paragraph indicating
they are applicable to other products in the Mozilla family. The
articles referenced do not have that sentence/paragraph. Is there
any *GROSS* difference between Thunderbird and SeaMonkey Mail/News?
I'm an antique using SeaMonkey 2.26.1 under WinXP Pro SP3.
I have only POP email.
.../[profileid].slt/Mail occupies 2.5 GB with 417 files in 66 folders
.../[profileid].slt/Mail/[primary email acct] occupies 136 files
in 15 folders
.../[profileid].slt/News occupies 140 MB with 162 files in 8 folders
I retain full text of all email.
I retain only headers for news.
I tend to:
1. take a coffee break when launching SeaMonkey.
2. hibernate my computer rather than shutdown SeaMonkey.
3. notice that defragging makes SeaMonkey load faster.
I have ~20 active tags for emails and news articles.
I use read and flag status as modifiers to above.
I use a paid news server so archives may be more extensive than
typical ;/
Functionality is *MORE* important than speed.
Comments &/or suggestions?
TIA
_______________________________________________
support-seamonkey mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
