Felix Miata wrote: > Arnie Goetchius composed on 2016-07-21 08:10 (UTC-0400): > >> Daniel wrote: > >>> And Arnie, if you do actually send in a real "Pen and Ink" letter, it might >>> also >>> be worthwhile mentioning that other browsers, which currently cannot get to >>> the >>> Chase site because of the incorrect sniffing, could/would also work if Chase >>> sniffed for the Gecko process, rather than for a particular Browser Name. > >> Thanks for the ideas. Sniffing for Gecko is the key. > > Sniffing for Gecko would be merely a major improvement, still an arbitrary > denier of any browser name which to the site's authors is unfamiliar. Sniffing > for functionality is the idea approach. Sniffing out functionality is entirely > browser name agnostic.
Thanks. I would like to include a link in my correspondence which explains "Sniffing out functionality". Would the following be a good example: https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/hh273397%28v=vs.85%29.aspx or would there be a better link? _______________________________________________ support-seamonkey mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
