On 7/21/16, Arnie Goetchius <[email protected]> wrote: > Felix Miata wrote: >> Arnie Goetchius composed on 2016-07-21 08:10 (UTC-0400): >> >>> Daniel wrote: >> >>>> And Arnie, if you do actually send in a real "Pen and Ink" letter, it >>>> might also >>>> be worthwhile mentioning that other browsers, which currently cannot get >>>> to the >>>> Chase site because of the incorrect sniffing, could/would also work if >>>> Chase >>>> sniffed for the Gecko process, rather than for a particular Browser >>>> Name. >> >>> Thanks for the ideas. Sniffing for Gecko is the key. >> >> Sniffing for Gecko would be merely a major improvement, still an >> arbitrary >> denier of any browser name which to the site's authors is unfamiliar. >> Sniffing >> for functionality is the idea approach. Sniffing out functionality is >> entirely >> browser name agnostic. > > Thanks. I would like to include a link in my correspondence which explains > "Sniffing out functionality". Would the following be a good example: > > https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/hh273397%28v=vs.85%29.aspx > > or would there be a better link?
"better" is a matter of opinion; I prefer https://www.w3.org/community/webed/wiki/Optimizing_content_for_different_browsers:_the_RIGHT_way which links to https://modernizr.com/ Regards, Lee _______________________________________________ support-seamonkey mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
