On Mon, 14 Nov 2016 10:47:13 -0500, W3BNR <[email protected]> wrote: >On 11/14/16 9:15 AM, TCW wrote: >> On Sun, 13 Nov 2016 00:19:17 +0100, Mason83 <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> On 12/11/2016 10:06, Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote: >>> >>>> I would either grab the 2.46 en-US release candidate or use one of >>>> Adrians unofficial versions till the official shows up. There are all >>>> great compared to 2.40. >>> I tried upgrading to Adrian's 2.46 release, but it borked my prefs.js >>> so I had to revert back to 2.40 using a backup :-( >>> >>> Regards. >> My hunch is going from 2.40 to 2.46 did it. There have been some >> usable builds in between then but it was likely due to something else. >> I've been using all the interim builds after 2.40 to, presently, 2.47 >> beta. Nothing weird happened between then and now. >I had no problems going from 2.40 (32 bit) to 2.46 (64 bit) on Windows10. >Been using 2.46 for better than a month with no problems.
We might be the exception and not the rule. _______________________________________________ support-seamonkey mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
