> Forgive me if I have misunderstood the meeting minutes, but since the nightly
> release channel will continue to support things like XUL overlays, legacy
> extensions, webextension eperiments, etc. [0], why don't you continue to
> ingest & build off of mozilla-central?

Nightlies will, of course be build. The list of bug which needs to be fixed before a SeaMonkey 2.54 would be usable is quite long and I didn't even file one or two for bookmark and other problems yet:

https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1394144

Download Manager e.g. needs a serious makeover before I would want it to be released. This is more a case study since 2.52 :)

> Is the plan to eventually switch back from ESR once bug fixes are landed and
> the API removal spree has subsided? Or will the API changes break more
> essential SeaMonkey features as well? It seems as if DOM
> Inspector/Lightning/Chatzilla all still seem to be working in current 2.54
> builds, which is a good sign.

I am still on 2.53. Didn't check if DOMi and cZ still work but if not they could surely being patched up. But Adblock+ and uBlock are both broken.

We switched to ESR so that we have more time to prepare a release. Unless 4 to 5 programmers pop up it is unlikely then we will return the do releases from the release repo. After the 52 ESR branch is eol we plan to switch to ESR 59 for 2.56.x. If nad when it comes to that is still unsure if Mozilla continues to destroy the old codebase. We need to port Web Extension support and e10s at least for later releases but this is a huge task for such a small team.

I am personally still at 2.53 / 56. Seems to be quite fast. 2.54 is unusable right now. Uninstalled all Fx 56/57 betas and nightlies and switched to esr 52 for testing only. I probably need to do a Fx Nightly again just to see what changed but this is all so much urgkkk for only fanboys to love. This is all rushed and I personally hope it backfires but even this would do SeaMonkey no good.

Building 2.49.1 should atart soon. Everything has been checked in now. A little late but we do what we can with the limited resourced at hand.

FRG

John Duncan wrote:
Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote:
I have a pacthes up 2.54 but it still needs at least two bugs fixed
before I would call it usable.

I am using a 2.53 with a few fixes still in review applied. If you want
it shoot me a mail Can bake any platform but Linux i686.

FRG

TCW wrote:
On 9/7/2017 1:26 PM, S Slicer wrote:
TCW wrote:
Before l10n.mozilla-community.org went down, I had the 2.52b x64
akalla built but it seems to be corrupt. Tried google but nothing's
coming up. 2.51 is the newest I could fine. Anyone have the x64
2.52b build handy?

I have 2.53a1, but this newsgroup would not let me attach it because
it is over 72 MG. I think is the last nightly build that I
downloaded.  The only other 64-bit one that I have saved is 2.45.

That's all right. I know *some* movement on getting it back on a
hosting place is happening
(https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1383642) but it might be
a while. I was already playing with the 2.54a builds but the amount of
stuff busted in it is forcing me to revert back.
Saw those patches for 2.54. Glad you guys are staying sane during the Mozilla API decimation.

Forgive me if I have misunderstood the meeting minutes, but since the nightly release channel will continue to support things like XUL overlays, legacy extensions, webextension eperiments, etc. [0], why don't you continue to ingest & build off of mozilla-central?

Is the plan to eventually switch back from ESR once bug fixes are landed and the API removal spree has subsided? Or will the API changes break more essential SeaMonkey features as well? It seems as if DOM Inspector/Lightning/Chatzilla all still seem to be working in current 2.54 builds, which is a good sign.

Total removal of complete themes could be a larger issue, though.

Thanks for your continued support.

[0]: https://wiki.mozilla.org/Add-ons/Firefox57
_______________________________________________
support-seamonkey mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Reply via email to