On Sat, 03 Jul 2010 22:08:52 +0200, Jep wrote: > > On Fri, 02 Jul 2010 12:50:00 +0200, Jep wrote: > >> Got a freenet node running for no less than a full week and even > >> the auto update did its job for the first time. Up til now I had > >> to un- and reinstall. > >> It disconnected me still, but deleting node.db4o and > >> persistent-temp while restarting FN was enough to reconnect. > >> > >> I noticed it helps somewhat to limit my downloads to exactly 1, > >> still CPU usage of java is way too high. > >> Allowing java to use only 1 of my dualcore and use of a helper > >> program to set javas priority to 'low' or even throttle the process > >> is not enough to keep cpu cycles consumption at bay. > >> > >> My Freenet install is somehow f%^#ed and I've got no idea how to > >> repair it. Manual update doesn't work at all, it sees not-existing > >> new versions that of course fail to install. Also, an experimental > >> downgrade to see if autoupdate works then did not work out. > >> Tried it on a second box with pretty much a plain vanilla xp sp3 > >> and it gives the same results. > >> > >> No software firewall, ports are checked opened in the hardware > >> router. Sun java 1.6.0_20-b02. > >> 512 mB allocated to FN, besides the wrapper version issue there are > >> no error msgs in the logs. Don't want to mail those because they > >> contain too much ID'ing, the command line update says: > >> - Freenet installation found at [....] > >> ----- > >> - Checking for Freenet JAR updates... > >> ----- > >> - Checking main jar > >> - New main jar found! > >> - Checking ext jar > >> - New ext jar found! > >> - Checking wrapper .exe > >> - New wrapper .exe found! > >> - Checking wrapper .dll > >> - New wrapper .dll found! > >> - Checking start.exe > >> - New start.exe found! > >> - Checking stop.exe > >> - New stop.exe found! > >> - Checking freenettray.exe > >> - New freenettray.exe found! > >> The system cannot find the path specified. > >> - Checking freenetlauncher.exe > >> - New freenetlauncher.exe found! > >> ----- > >> - New Freenet version found! Installing now... > >> ----- > >> - Downloading new files... > >> Error while handling the CA :java.io.IOException: > >> DerValue.getBigInteger, not an > >> int 48 > >> java.security.cert.CertificateParsingException: > >> java.io.IOException: DerValue.ge > >> tBigInteger, not an int 48 > >> at sun.security.x509.X509CertInfo.<init>(Unknown Source) > >> at sun.security.x509.X509CertImpl.parse(Unknown Source) > >> at sun.security.x509.X509CertImpl.<init>(Unknown Source) > >> at > >> sun.security.provider.X509Factory.parseX509orPKCS7Cert(Unknown > >> Source ) > >> at > >> sun.security.provider.X509Factory.engineGenerateCertificates > >> (Unknown Source) > >> at > >> java.security.cert.CertificateFactory.generateCertificates(Unknown > >> So urce) > >> at Sha1Test.main(Sha1Test.java:52) > >> Caused by: java.io.IOException: DerValue.getBigInteger, not an int > >> 48 at sun.security.util.DerValue.getBigInteger(Unknown Source) > >> at sun.security.x509.SerialNumber.construct(Unknown > >> Source) at sun.security.x509.SerialNumber.<init>(Unknown Source) > >> at sun.security.x509.CertificateSerialNumber.<init> > >> (Unknown Source) at sun.security.x509.X509CertInfo.parse(Unknown > >> Source) ... 7 more > >> - Error! Freenet update failed, one or more files didn't download > >> correctly... > >> ----- > >> - Cleaning up... > >> - Changing file permissions > >> ========== > >> > >> Any suggestion? Thanks. > > Dennis Nezic schreef: > > What's the name of that java profiling program that profiles which > > functions all the cpu work is going into? :P > > > > (Also, during the high-cpu periods, how much memory (out of your > > 512mb) is being used?) > > It's a winz utility called 'Process Lasso', an extended task manager, > not something aimed at particularly java. Another one I've used in > the past is freeware; 'Process Tamer'. Both help to keep my box at > least useable to some extent while java is claiming the whole machine. > Both allow for setting priority of apps. PL has added functions like > average CPU consumption of a process over time. Of java that's 43%, > so very near to the 50% max (1 core of 2). > It is not a memory issue it seems. Java takes 103,500 K now. > At this moment there's yet another FN version out and update didn't > do its job again so Freenet is disconnected & it's back to > re-installing once more.
There should be other profiling apps that actually debug the program's (freenet's) internal functions -- to see whether the cpu is doing garbage collection work, or other dumb things :). _______________________________________________ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe
