On Sat, 22 Jan 2011 07:26:56 +1300, Phillip Hutchings wrote: > > On 22/01/2011, at 7:21 AM, Dennis Nezic wrote: > > > On Fri, 21 Jan 2011 05:59:06 +0100, David ‘Bombe’ Roden wrote: > >> a “simple thing” like bandwidth limiting > > > > Can someone explain why bandwidth limiting might not be such a > > simple thing? Volodya tried, with his massive-incoming-packet theory > > (40KiB :p), but that's not true -- freenet packets are about 1KiB. > > So, is there not a central class/wrapper in place that feeds the > > node with at most X KiB / second? Ie. it will only read X UDP > > packets per second? > > It doesn't matter if you only read X packets a second, they've still > been sent to you so it still used bandwidth. If you don't read UDP > all that happens is your OS queues for a while the starts dropping > packets.
Exactly. Why isn't this being done? _______________________________________________ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe
