On Thursday 11 December 2008 20:37, Level 13 wrote: > Here's the relevant part of the wrapper.log (at least I think it's the > right part, as it's the one that's different from old entries when the > node was running fine):
Oooooh.... what version was it running? I'm fairly sure this has been fixed recently. > > INFO | jvm 1 | 2008/12/11 12:31:13 | WrapperManager Error: Error > in WrapperListener.start callback. java.lang.NumberFormatException: > For input string: "4329173579036400079" > INFO | jvm 1 | 2008/12/11 12:31:13 | WrapperManager Error: > java.lang.NumberFormatException: For input string: > "4329173579036400079" > INFO | jvm 1 | 2008/12/11 12:31:13 | WrapperManager Error: at > java.lang.NumberFormatException.forInputString(Unknown Source) > INFO | jvm 1 | 2008/12/11 12:31:13 | WrapperManager Error: at > java.lang.Integer.parseInt(Unknown Source) > INFO | jvm 1 | 2008/12/11 12:31:13 | WrapperManager Error: at > java.lang.Integer.parseInt(Unknown Source) > INFO | jvm 1 | 2008/12/11 12:31:13 | WrapperManager Error: at > freenet.node.updater.UpdateOverMandatoryManager$13.accept(UpdateOverMandatoryManager.java:1287) > INFO | jvm 1 | 2008/12/11 12:31:13 | WrapperManager Error: at > java.io.File.listFiles(Unknown Source) > INFO | jvm 1 | 2008/12/11 12:31:13 | WrapperManager Error: at > freenet.node.updater.UpdateOverMandatoryManager.removeOldTempFiles(UpdateOverMandatoryManager.java:1269) > INFO | jvm 1 | 2008/12/11 12:31:13 | WrapperManager Error: at > freenet.node.updater.NodeUpdateManager.<init>(NodeUpdateManager.java:157) > INFO | jvm 1 | 2008/12/11 12:31:13 | WrapperManager Error: at > freenet.node.updater.NodeUpdateManager.maybeCreate(NodeUpdateManager.java:263) > INFO | jvm 1 | 2008/12/11 12:31:13 | WrapperManager Error: at > freenet.node.Node.<init>(Node.java:1879) > INFO | jvm 1 | 2008/12/11 12:31:13 | WrapperManager Error: at > freenet.node.NodeStarter.start(NodeStarter.java:152) > INFO | jvm 1 | 2008/12/11 12:31:13 | WrapperManager Error: at > org.tanukisoftware.wrapper.WrapperManager$11.run(WrapperManager.java:2979) > > > Other than that, running update.cmd updated the node and solved the > startup issues. Evidently it was then. > > There's still that infamous message present: "Probably a bug: please > report: 3 peers forcibly disconnected due to not acknowledging > packets. > 3 of your peers are having severe problems (not acknowledging packets > even after 10 minutes). This is probably due to a bug in the code. > Please report it to us at the bug tracker at > https://bugs.freenetproject.org/ or to the support mailing list > support at freenetproject.org. Please include this message and what > version of the node you are running. The affected peers (you may not > want to include this in your bug report if they are darknet peers) > are:[...]" :| > > But the number of peers shown there is now lower than it was earlier. > > Should I be worried about this message: > "Connection problems: Please forward UDP port XXXX (you may have > already done this). > Your node appears to be behind some sort of NAT (see the connectivity > page for details). You should forward UDP (not TCP) port XXXX if > possible to improve connectivity. It is possible you have already done > this; it takes a while for Freenet to detect a port forward. See here > for some more information." > The port in question is portforwarded correctly, though. If you're sure the port is forwarded then no, it's not a big deal. Detecting whether a port is forwarded or not is not easy. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 827 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/attachments/20081211/857ace9b/attachment.pgp>
