Alright Chris, Thanks so much for your help in this. I am not sure if you saw, but I did post my findings later on that afternoon. Thanks again, Ryan
-----Original Message----- From: Chris Buechler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, February 22, 2008 12:59 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] Does Captive Portal require Squid? Radio Tech wrote: > Hey Chris, Thanks for taking the time for this. When i say it doesn't work, > i mean all internet traffic goes though without authorization. It skips the > CP page. I was just trying to solve the problem. I tried it on a fresh > install without blocking anything on the LAN rules. I did find later that > if I bypass the failover pool I had setup, everything works fine. I guess CP > is not compatible with load balancer or failover. Oh, yes, if traffic hits a rule with a load balancer or alternate gateway, it bypasses CP. That's a limitation of the way CP (ipfw) can conflict with the pf ruleset. That's on my to do list to look at fixing, won't happen in the initial 1.2 release. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] __________ NOD32 2896 (20080222) Information __________ This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system. http://www.eset.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
