On Sat, Feb 27, 2016 at 11:54:39AM +0000, Politis Archontis wrote: > And I forgot to mention in the previous message that, while I don't > see any benefit in the virtual loudspeaker approach, I see benefits > in the direct approach. Doing the virtual loudspeaker decoding, you'll > need some uniform arrangement of decoding directions that will be most > likely of more points than the harmonics, so you'll need more convolutions > compared to the minimum of the direct approach (N+1)^2.
No, this is not true. The decoder and convolution matrix can be combined into a (N+1)^2 * 2 convolution matrix. The only remaining difference is the set of directions. And it is known that using too many speakers for a given order is suboptimal. Ciao, -- FA A world of exhaustive, reliable metadata would be an utopia. It's also a pipe-dream, founded on self-delusion, nerd hubris and hysterically inflated market opportunities. (Cory Doctorow) _______________________________________________ Sursound mailing list [email protected] https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound - unsubscribe here, edit account or options, view archives and so on.
