Paul, > BTW Most older (386 / early 486) AMI BIOSes that I've tested, go back to > 1/1/1980 after midnight on 31 December 1999. That's simply inexcusable! Especially when my (now 13 year old) version 1 Amstrad PC1512 BIOS doesn't mind Y2K at all. Regards, Web: http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Horizon/8786 Ben A L Jemmett ICQ: 9848866 JGSD e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -------------------------------------------------------------------------- '<INSERT SOME CORNY QUOTE HERE>' -------------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from SURVPC send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe SURVPC in the body of the message. Also, trim this footer from any quoted replies.
- Re: [SURVPC] Y2K problem is a lie? [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: [SURVPC] Y2K problem is a lie? Ben Hood
- Re: [SURVPC] Y2K problem is a lie? No Name
- Re: [SURVPC] Y2K problem is a lie? John Oram
- Re: [SURVPC] Y2K problem is a lie? Bernie
- Re: [SURVPC] Y2K problem is a lie? Bernie
- Re: [SURVPC] Y2K problem is a lie? Jos Gielen
- Re: [SURVPC] Y2K problem is a lie? Gunnar Thoele
- Re: [SURVPC] Y2K problem is a lie? [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: [SURVPC] Y2K problem is a lie? Paul Cull
- Re: [SURVPC] Y2K problem is a lie? Ben A L Jemmett
- Re: [SURVPC] Y2K problem is a lie? Brent Reynolds
- Re: [SURVPC] Y2K problem is a lie? Bob George
- Re: [SURVPC] Y2K problem is a lie? Bernie
- Re: [SURVPC] Y2K problem is a lie? Bob George
- Re: [SURVPC] Y2K problem is a lie? Bernie
