At 06:43 PM 1/5/00 +0100, you wrote: >Lets just see how long it will take before this topic is deemed OT by >Travis and we are forbidden to talk about it again ;) >//Bernie Or you could save travis the trouble and drop it now, I did. I still stand on my opinion, but I am not discussing this topic on this forum any longer, because we ALL KNOW it's off topic and annoying to others. To unsubscribe from SURVPC send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe SURVPC in the body of the message. Also, trim this footer from any quoted replies.
- Re: [SURVPC] way OT y2k? nadda Bob George
- Re: [SURVPC] way OT y2k? nadda Casper Gielen
- Re: [SURVPC] way OT y2k? nadda Ben Hood
- Re: [SURVPC] way OT y2k? nadda Bernie
- Re: [SURVPC] way OT y2k? nadda [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: [SURVPC] way OT y2k? nadda Bernie
- Re: [SURVPC] way OT y2k? nadda Brent Reynolds
- Re: [SURVPC] way OT y2k? nadda Bob George
- Re: [SURVPC] way OT y2k? nadda Bernie
- Re: [SURVPC] way OT y2k? nadda [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: [SURVPC] way OT y2k? nadda Bob George
- Re: [SURVPC] way OT y2k? nadda Bernie
- Re: [SURVPC] way OT y2k? nadda Bob George
- Re: [SURVPC] way OT y2k? nadda Chad Fernandez
- Re: [SURVPC] way OT y2k? nadda Bernie
