Bob wrote:
>Uhm, we may have drifted from the original topic - the (original) point was
>that seeing LAN activity on an "unoccupied" network is not at all unusual,
>and is necessary in many cases, particulary -- especially -- if more than
>one subnet is involved.
The orignal topic IIRC was that it was useless to let them be turned on
when they aren't doing anything usefull. Power and bandwidth consumption
are the two problems with it and why they should instead be turned off.
(IMHO of course).
> International Energy Star, NUTEK, and VESA DPMS compliant
>From http://www.nutek.se/home_page_eng.html
"NUTEK is Sweden�s central public authority for industrial policy issues.
Our main task is to stimulate industrial development throughout the country."
(http://www.nutek.se/information/english/activorg_eng.html for more info)
>The "Designed for" is pretty scary in a monitor for Pete's sake! I'd not
>realized that MPR is TUV (German) equivalent earlier.
(Almost) everything these days has a label on them stating "Made/Designed
for Windows [whatever]". In truth all (I'm a little unsure perhaps there
are more exceptions) except TV-Cards, Scanners and USB equipment are "Made
for DOS" but I haven't seen that on anything at all. "Made for a PC" would
IMO be the best thing to stick on them - but what would the point eb with that?
//Bernie
http://hem1.passagen.se/bernie/index.htm DOS programs, Star Wars ...
To unsubscribe from SURVPC send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
unsubscribe SURVPC in the body of the message.
Also, trim this footer from any quoted replies.
More info can be found at;
http://www.softcon.com/archives/SURVPC.html
