On 30 Aug 2000, at 5:55, Eko Priono wrote:
> Bad idea, they'd kicked you out when they found out about
> that on the yearly renewal site check. I've sent a workaround
> idea for noframe support. Got positive reply, but no change
> yet. Guess it'll took awfully longer to even budge a dustpile
> on a huge corp like that <g>
I took it out before your reply, because of someone else telling me
about that. What about a <a href="lazybeam.html"
target="_top">Click here to continue</a>? Would that contravene
the TOS? (FWIW www.lazybeam.net has a picture of my car :-)
> AFAIK there's no change with Namezero: http://www.namezero.com
> You still should confirm your email address's validity with a mailed
> out random URL/password combination. But InstantName *did* closed
> for new accounts: http://www.instantname.com/
I registered gimpstein.com a few weeks ago, and it is still available
from networksolutions...
> Not anymore... It *was* doable when VA still allow .htaccess
> level URL-rewriting.
That would have been good.
> Nah! IIRC redirection always works properly for me (my assigned
> physical server is s10).
I meant http://hoody.virtualave.net/subfolder always got redirected
to http://s3.virtualave.net/subfolder/ - notice the slash?
> But SSI-inserted VA Banner didn't. It
> works just fine now, only a single line SSI placeholder needed
> for each virtualized pages. No more "three pieces" just to
> enter a public place! ;-)
Now something's wrong with the frames. If the banner is displayed
in one from, it is not supposed to put the popup - check
http://hoody.virtualave.net/fun/trisf.html with a JS-capable browser.
> --Eko
> The SurvPC Network Development Team
Cool name ;-)
To unsubscribe from SURVPC send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
unsubscribe SURVPC in the body of the message.
Also, trim this footer from any quoted replies.
More info can be found at;
http://www.softcon.com/archives/SURVPC.html
