On 2000-09-01 [EMAIL PROTECTED] <Randy> said: >Some people use Linux for the things you find important, >others have different interests. Personally, I appreciate >having choices, and think the more apps that are available >for a powerful, versatile, and *free* OS, the better. Fine. I hope Linux continues to thrive for all the right reasons, including those you've mentioned. Jerry [o - - ] IBM PC/AT 5170/enhanced [--^~---] 9600 kbps ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| [--===--] V.32/V.42bis Net-Tamer V 1.11.2X - Registered To unsubscribe from SURVPC send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe SURVPC in the body of the message. Also, trim this footer from any quoted replies. More info can be found at; http://www.softcon.com/archives/SURVPC.html
- DOS and the future (was: DOS and Windows ME) Or Botton
- DOS and the future (was: DOS and Windows ME) Or Botton
- Re: DOS and the future (was: DOS and Windows ME) Jerry J. Haumberger
- Re: DOS and the future (was: DOS and Windows ME) Randy Goldenberg
- Re: DOS and the future (was: DOS and Windows ME) Bob George
- Re: DOS and the future (was: DOS and Windows ME) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: DOS and the future (was: DOS and Windows ME) Or Botton
- Re: DOS and the future (was: DOS and Windows ME) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: DOS and the future (was: DOS and Windows ME) Jerry J. Haumberger
- Re: DOS and the future (was: DOS and Windows ME) Jerry J. Haumberger
- Re: DOS and the future (was: DOS and Windows ME) Jerry J. Haumberger
- Re: DOS and the future (was: DOS and Windows ME) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: DOS and the future (was: DOS and Windows ME) Or Botton
- Re: DOS and the future (was: DOS and Windows ME) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: DOS and the future (was: DOS and Windows ME) Bob George
- Re: DOS and the future (was: DOS and Windows ME) Or Botton
- Re: DOS and the future (was: DOS and Windows ME) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: DOS and the future (was: DOS and Windows ME) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: DOS and the future (was: DOS and Windows ME) Or Botton
