> Win 3.11 doesn't even multitask in the exact sense of the word... i think
> time-sharing is the appropriate word here... but that means it spends time
> on programs waiting for keyboard input... that's not multitasking in my
> eyes...
I think W98 works about the same as far as multitasking goes.... your
not really multitasking until your running Unix.
> 'cause the more
> RAM you give Windows the more RAM it will use for its own....
Like I said before, the more you give Windows, the more it will Hog :-)
> What i think about this: the more RAM you have, the better... i don't think
> 128Mb is excessive....
While reading PC World today, I read a little thing on RAM. They said
the time to upgrade is right about now, because it is supposed to go up
in price by the beginning of the year, I think it was. They also said
64megs was about the minimum, which would put 128megs at about right. I
got the idea that 256, they still considered BIG.
Chad Fernandez
Michigan, USA
To unsubscribe from SURVPC send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
unsubscribe SURVPC in the body of the message.
Also, trim this footer from any quoted replies.
More info can be found at;
http://www.softcon.com/archives/SURVPC.html
