At 04:36 PM 10/31/00 -0800, you wrote:
> I am looking for input from other users. I have Win 95 on my PC, and
>more and more of my software would work better if I actually had
>FUNCTIONAL USB support. It seems that even though my version of '95 says
>it is there, it will NOT work!! My question is this: should I bother to
>upgrade to Win98 SE? Is it that much more stable than 95?? Will all my
>'95 software work with 98?? And, no, I have NO intention or desire to
>experiment with ME. Thanks gang.
> -Dean Dancey
I am much happier with win98 than I was with win95 and the SE is more
stable, but you DO have to have more RAM and a faster processor, it will
slow you down. So if your machine is over 200MHz and 40MB RAM or more,
then yes, it's a good idea (oh, HDD space too, need about 200MB more or so)
but if not, you are better seeking another solution to your USB problems.
bye,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,(\
Yolanda ,,,A+,,,,,,\\_/(\
UIN 4898262,,,,,,,,,Q Q \)
rockettalk 383426 =(_T_)=
http://members.home.net/pippi5
http://members.home.net/villasubrosa/garden
"The foot is the end organ of the lower extremity."
To unsubscribe from SURVPC send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
unsubscribe SURVPC in the body of the message.
Also, trim this footer from any quoted replies.
More info can be found at;
http://www.softcon.com/archives/SURVPC.html
