Bernie wrote:
> Personally Win98 was slower than Win95 for me, however I noticed something
> interesting when I switched back to my old installation of Win95 (on
> another HD that hadn't been in before - I used a completly fresh 10.1GB HD
> for Win98 at a "LAN party") it found the settings for the network on the
> other HD and copied them into it's own (I hadn't had the network card
> installed earlier, and no IP address set for that matter either).
How about 98Lite?? I have heard good things about it, in that it
allows removal of many devices that eat resources. I am still doing
research on the upgrade. Thanks -Dean
To unsubscribe from SURVPC send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
unsubscribe SURVPC in the body of the message.
Also, trim this footer from any quoted replies.
More info can be found at;
http://www.softcon.com/archives/SURVPC.html