On 8/4/07, Rafael J. Wysocki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Usually, only the package full license is shown here. > > For dependencies only short copyright signature is displayed. > > Do you wish to put the full license of each dependency as well? > > Not the full license, but the name of it and a URL to the full copy if the > name alone is ambiguous. > > For example, if the license is GPLv2, it should be sufficient, to write > "GPLv2" > in there etc.
Hmm... You can help you know... I did not had to do this for autoconf/automake migration. It should have already be available. OK... Forget licensing... Just rename LICENSE to COPYING. Alon. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ Suspend-devel mailing list Suspend-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/suspend-devel
