On Friday, 3 August 2007 23:58, Alon Bar-Lev wrote: > On 8/4/07, Rafael J. Wysocki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Usually, only the package full license is shown here. > > > For dependencies only short copyright signature is displayed. > > > Do you wish to put the full license of each dependency as well? > > > > Not the full license, but the name of it and a URL to the full copy if the > > name alone is ambiguous. > > > > For example, if the license is GPLv2, it should be sufficient, to write > > "GPLv2" > > in there etc. > > Hmm... You can help you know...
Perhaps I'm doing something else, which I consider as more important, in parallel? > I did not had to do this for autoconf/automake migration. > It should have already be available. > > OK... Forget licensing... Just rename LICENSE to COPYING. Which is necessary, because? Greetings, Rafael -- "Premature optimization is the root of all evil." - Donald Knuth ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ Suspend-devel mailing list Suspend-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/suspend-devel
