Some excerpted highlights follow:

 "Technical Barriers to the Use of Ethanol in Diesel Fuel"
   Robert L. McCormick
   Center for Transportation Technologies and Systems
   National Renewable Energy Laboratory
   Golden, CO 80401-3393
 "7th Annual National Ethanol Conference"
   February 27-March 1, 2002
   San Diego, CA
 19 page PDF > http://www.ethanolrfa.org/NEC02-McCormick.pdf

 Overview
 *Rationale
 *What is E-Diesel?
 *Main Technical Barriers
 *Flashpoint/Flammability
     Flashpoint defines e-diesel as a Class I liquid (like gasoline)
       for fire safety purposes
     Additionally, tank vapor space is flammable under some conditions
     Bottom Line for E-Diesel: 
 *Other OEM Requirements
 *Stability and Water Tolerance
     Some additive suppliers indicate tolerance of up to 3% water.
 *Lubricity/Pump Wear
 *Pollutant Emissions
 *Fleet Demonstration Results
 *Summary

 - Blending Ethanol in Diesel
 - Some Typical Properties
 - Engine and Fuel Injection Equipment Manufactures Acceptance
 - Summary of Technical Barriers
      Performance of e-diesel in 2007 engines (equipped with EGR
      and exhaust treatment systems) using 15 ppm S diesel fuel
      will become an issue in the near future.

 ==============

 Background
   All diesel fuel injection equipment has some reliance on
 diesel fuel as a lubricant. The lubricating properties of
 diesel fuel are important, especially for rotary and distributor 
 type fuel injection pumps. In these pumps, moving parts are
 lubricated by the fuel itself as it moves through the pump-not by
 the engine oil. Other diesel fuel systems - which include
 unit injectors, injectors, unit pumps, and in-line pumps
 are partially fuel lubricated. In these systems the.....
   Low lubricity fuel may cause high wear and scarring and
 high lubricity fuel may provide reduced wear and longer component life. 
 Lubricity has sometimes been mistakenly compared to the viscosity,
 or thickness of a fuel. The following statement from Lucas.....
   Recent changes (1993 and beyond) in the composition of diesel fuel,
 primarily the need to reduce fuel sulfur and aromatic levels,
 and the common chemical process used to accomplish these changes
 (called hydro-treating) have inadvertently caused the removal of some
 of the compounds that provide lubricity to the fuel. According to
 Mr. Paul Henderson, .....
   Typically, Number 1 diesel fuel (commonly referred to as kerosene),
 which is used in colder climates, has poorer lubricity than
 Number 2 diesel fuel.  A 1998 review paper on fuel lubricity worldwide2
 showed that diesel fuel in the US and Canada is some of the poorest
 lubricity fuel found in the entire world (see Figure 1 attached). 
 Of the 27 countries surveyed, only Canada, Switzerland, Poland and 
 Taiwan had poorer lubricity fuel than the US.  With a mean fuel lubricity
 of just under the recommended specification of an HFRR wear scar diameter
 of 460 microns, fully 50% of the US fuel was found to be above that
 recommended by equipment manufacturers. 
    These US data are with diesel fuel refined to meet the current EPA
 restriction of 500 ppm maximum sulfur specification.  The severe
 hyrdrotreating required to reduce fuel sulfur to the new EPA 2006
 specification of 15 ppm sulfur maximum will cause a further reduction
 in fuel lubricity compared to today's diesel fuel, and is of concern
 to engine and fuel injection equipment manufacturers. 
    Lubricity Benefits Provided by Biodiesel 
 For the HFRR, a lower wear scar indicates better lubricity. 
 Biodiesel has been tested, at varying concentrations, with poor lubricity
 Number 2 and Number 1 diesel fuels representative of that on the market
 after 1993 (i.e. fuel refined to meet a 500 ppm maximum sulfur content). 

 Lubricity Benefits
 Percent Biodiesel        HFRR Scar (mm)* 
                      [MH: BD lube effectiveness via percentage %]
                        Number 2     Number 1
   0.0                   536   -        671   -
   0.4                   481  10%       649   3%
   1.0                   321  40%       500  25%
   2.0                   322  40%       355  47%
  20.0                   314  41%       318  53%
 100.0                   314  41%       314  53%
 *Results provided by Stanadyne Automotive Corp.

   Stanadyne Automotive has stated: 
 "....we have tested biodiesel at Stanadyne and results indicate that the 
 inclusion of 2% biodiesel into any conventional diesel fuel will be sufficient 
 to address the lubricity concerns that we have with these existing diesel 
 fuels. From our standpoint, inclusion of biodiesel is desirable for two 
 reasons......
   The reasoning behind Stanadyne's support of 2% biodiesel makes biodiesel
 an ideal solution to the existing lubricity problem with diesel fuel-while
 supporting other environmental, energy security, and economic development
 initiatives.  As EPA forces the further removal of sulfur from diesel fuel
 in 2006, which will undoubtedly worsen fuel lubricity, the concentration
 of biodiesel can be raised to that necessary to fully protect this
 future fuel as well. 
   In fact, biodiesel tested higher in lubricity than any other diesel fuel
 tested at the Institute. The conclusions drawn by the researchers from
 Southwest Research Institute were: 
 "Biodiesel fuels consisting of methyl esters of soybean oil had excellent
 scuffing and adhesive wear resistance that exceeds those of the best
 conventional diesel fuels." 

 Read the full report: 
 National Biodiesel Board
 "Lubricity Benefits"
 4 page PDF > http://www.biodiesel.org/pdf_files/Lubricity.PDF

 ==============

   Vegetable based alternative diesel fuel lubricity additives were
 investigated in this study. Eleven low level biodiesel blends
 were tested with a low sulfur winter diesel fuel containing no
 other additives. The treat rate was 1vol%. 
   Two different alcohols (methanol and ethanol) and
 four different oilseed crops, sunflower, flax/linseed, rapeseed
 and canola, were processed. 
   A U.S. commercial biodiesel fuel additive was also obtained
 for testing.
   In the mid-90's, sulfur compounds were removed from diesel fuels
 due to concern over exhaust emissions.  Unfortunately,
 the hydrotreating process used to reduce sulfur results in
 a less oily diesel fuel. This reduced lubricity in some cases
 may be causing injection pump failures and accelerated engine wear. 
 To help remedy the problem, refiners are using industrial additives
 in low viscosity Canadian winter fuels. 
   All of the 1vol% biodiesel blends raised the Lubricity Number of
 the unadditized, low sulfur reference diesel fuel above the M-ROCLE
 pass/fail value of 1.0. 
   
 SCDC Fact Sheet/ Research Project Summary
 Lubricity Survey of Low-Level Biodiesel Fuel Additives 
 Using the "Munson ROCLE" Bench Test
 SAE Paper # 1999-01-3590
 Fall 1999
 2 page PDF > http://www.scdc.sk.ca/pdf/fact5lubri.pdf



`

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuels list archives:
http://archive.nnytech.net/

Please do NOT send "unsubscribe" messages to the list address.
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 


Reply via email to