Except the loss of a pilot is most likely accompanied by the loss of an aircraft so when they are all gone what good does it do to have a bunch of trained pilots standing around with nothing to fly??
Joe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >actually, from a strategic military standpoint, this is an extremely wise >practice. in any high attrition conflict (read: protracted a/o bloody war), >the >human resources are depleted well before the hardware. trained pilots are >about the most difficult personnel to replace and their loss represents a loss >in capability many timers greater than does the loss of other service >personnel. > >-chris b. > > >In a message dated 8/24/05 2:50:59 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > ><<I admit I don't know the exact number of aircraft in readiness status, ><<who does?. . .but I do know that Canadian pilots take a tour flying a desk >simply ><<because there aren't enough planes to go around. >> > > >_______________________________________________ >Biofuel mailing list >Biofuel@sustainablelists.org >http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org > >Biofuel at Journey to Forever: >http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html > >Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages): >http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/ > > > _______________________________________________ Biofuel mailing list Biofuel@sustainablelists.org http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org Biofuel at Journey to Forever: http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages): http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/