Hi, Jonathan-

Jonathan Chetwynd wrote:
> 
> In case of complete mozilla SVG developer obtuseness as currently  
> available in bucket loads: it is an accessibility issue, a usability  
> issue and if commonsense and commercial realism aren't enough an  
> enhancement request as well. However they know best... "audio will  
> irritate most people"

Quit taking my words out of context.  As I said to you on IRC a couple 
days ago, "peepo, I don't want you to have the impression that I don't 
think audio is important.  I do.  I love that SVGT1.2 now has a 
standardized way to implement it in browsers.  I will push for them to 
do so [browsers to implement it].  I just don't think it's needed for a 
logo."  My statement was clearly about specific content (the logo), not 
about the capability of the UA.

Imagine this scenario:  a user goes to a page where the author indicates 
that to view the content, they will need an SVG viewer;  this was common 
in the early days of Flash, and until SVG is widely available on IE, I 
think this is may be the most common use case for the logo (I know my 
company uses a similar indicator on the log-in screen).

The user either has SVG capability (they are using a modern browser or 
have a plug-in), or they go and get it (we hope!) and come back.  There, 
they are hit with the "ding-Ding-DING" or "fwoosh!" or (basso profundo) 
"SVG Powered!" sound of the logo.  Maybe they ignore it, or maybe they 
hear it once and think, "Hah, that's cute".

Then they visit the site again.  And again.  And they go to another site 
that uses the SVG logo.  And as SVG becomes even more popular (I'm an 
optimist, remember), they hear that sound more and more.

The user doesn't want to browse with the sound off on their computer 
because they are listening to their iTunes, or disable audio in their 
browser because they are streaming Pandora.

I have no doubt that they would come to associate that sound with SVG, 
it's true... but the flip side is that they would start associating SVG 
with that dang sound that keeps hitting them every time they stumble on 
a page using SVG.  It happens when they are browsing at work, in a cafe, 
etc.  For me, the irritation would start to really kick in right around 
the 2nd or 3rd time, and grow from there.  Sorry, but I don't want SVG 
to become associated with the aural equivalent of the <blink> tag.

So, what does a sensible SVG author do?  They take out the sound, or use 
the sound-free version (which I assure you, the logo contest would 
provide).  Accessibility, as you know, is something that only works well 
when it is consistent (such as by providing an inobtrusive text 
fallback).  If the sound is present some places, but not others, it 
merely sends a mixed indicator to those who would benefit from it, which 
is actually even worse.

Finally, what makes you think that visually-impaired people want to be 
assailed by sound any more than sighted people?  Do you think I like 
having Flash banners blinking at me from the sidebar or top of the page? 
  Let's be clear: when you are talking about accessibility, are you 
talking about for the visually-impaired, or for some other group?

We could provide a more discrete way to activate the sound than on load 
time, such as when the user focuses it (clicking on the logo, or tabbing 
to it).  But this has several drawbacks:
1)  It drastically increases the file size (in which case authors will 
use the smaller sound-free version, see above);
2)  If the user already has a screen-reader, the sound would obscure the 
voicing of the text equivalent provided by the metadata/text fallback;
3)  Finding a professional-quality distinctive sound would be even more 
difficult and expensive than finding a professional-quality logo, since 
it's not as common a hobby and is even more subject to taste (and I'm 
not willing to settle for a mediocre sound).

Now imagine some different scenarios:  I am building a Web application, 
and I provide discreet but clear UI sounds... clicks, slides, zooms (for 
the record, this is not theoretical, I've done this at a client's 
behest, for special-needs kids, and it worked well).  Or, I provide an 
audio help system, or a tutorial.  Or I make a simple audio mixer in 
SVG.  Or I have an audio and/or video streaming player in SVG in my 
browser.  Or, like your site, when the user focuses a particular icon, a 
specific sound is played.

These are all good uses of sound in SVG... or rather, good uses of sound 
on the Web.  They have context and enhance --rather than detract from-- 
the user experience.  I'm very glad that we are starting to make this 
possible (after way too long).

Having it on a logo?  Not appropriate.

Regards-
-Doug


-----
To unsubscribe send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-or-
visit http://groups.yahoo.com/group/svg-developers and click "edit my 
membership"
---- 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/svg-developers/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/svg-developers/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


Reply via email to