Why ? 1. Firefox and Opera support is no where near complete compare to both Adobe SVG Viewer. It really limit the scope of the application you could develop with those 2 browser as target.
2. For IE, you need plugin anyway. And the best SVG viewer (Adobe) is dead. If your application involves simple stuff which works fine in Firefox and Opera, and you only target less than 20% of the browser install base, go ahead with SVG. I have been a SVG fan for a long time (for the exact same reason as Kevin), and did develop application with it. But since Adobe pull the plug, it is a whole different game. Tony --- In [email protected], Guy Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Why would I want to ask my Firefox and Opera-using clients to > download a plug-in to do something those browsers can already do > natively? > > Maybe if all you really care about is Windows, then yeah, knock > yourself out. > > A vote for proprietary technology in this case is a vote for more > corporate power. Yeah, I think M$ needs some more of that. I'm sure > they'll never abuse it. Let's all help M$ by adopting WPF/E over > equivalent open standard and open source alternatives! > > Guy > > > > > On 05/12/2006, at 4:47 PM, kggsystem wrote: > > > Well, too bad you won't give it a spin. > > > > I forgot to mention that the WPF/E Beta has runtimes for Internet > > Explorer and Firefox on the PC, and for the MAC. Linux runtimes will > > follow within a year. Makes me wonder how much more effort the FF > > people will want to put into SVG now that they have this WPF/E stuff. > > > > I have been a SVG fan for a long time, but not because it was an Open > > Standard spec'd by comittee. I am a fan of SVG because of what it can > > do for me and my customers. I am a fan because of it's declarative > > nature, elegant schema, rich feature set, and scriptable DOM. So by > > extension I am a fan of this WPF/E stuff too. Same model. It has > > nothing to do with blinders or gullibility or that Bill Gates > > invented the Web, Cellular Telephone, and Transistor or whatever else > > he invented. > > > > Kevin > > > > > > > > > > --- In [email protected], Guy Morton <guy@> wrote: > >> > >> Nup, I'm not the least bit interested in that. Another proprietary > >> model for delivering "rich web apps"? no thanks. > >> > >> I can't believe *anyone*, except die-hard and blinkered M$ fans, > > can want this. > >> > >> Sounds like they ought to be able to support SVG using this stuff > >> though, and pretty easily I'd have thought. Clearly they understand > >> the problem space well enough. What's lacking, as always with M$, > >> is the will to give support to a technology they can't own. > >> It's my fervent hope that sooner or later this will bring about > >> their demise, however, breathless announcements about how "cool" > >> stuff like this is indicates to me that M$ are as good as ever at > >> spinning a line for the gullible. They'll have everyone believing > >> they invented the web all over again. > >> > >> Let's hope this goes the way of "Microsoft Network", and they are > >> eventually forced to throw their lot in with the rest of humanity, > >> instead of reinventing everything as their own. > >> > >> Guy > >> > >> On 05/12/2006, at 6:56 AM, kggsystem wrote: > >> > >>> WPF/E is much more closer to SVG than the full fledged WPF, in > > that it > >>> runs "loose markup" with a scripting model, in a browser. The Full > >>> Fledged WPF really requires a compilation step before it is very > >>> useful. > >>> > >>> SVG Model > >>> > >>> 1) User in Browser points to an URL that might be HTML and/or SVG. > >>> 2) Files (HTML, SVG, JS, CSS) are returned, rendered, and the > > scripts > >>> are activated. Javascript can manipulate the SVG DOM to do stuff > >>> 3) User is in Business > >>> > >>> WPF/E Model > >>> > >>> 1) User in Browser points to an URL that might be HTML and/or > > XAML. > >>> 2) Files (HTML, XAML, JS) are returned, rendered, and the scripts > > are > >>> activated. Javascript can manipulate the WPF/E DOM to do stuff > >>> 3) User is in Business > >>> > >>> Check it out, you might find it interesting > >>> > >>> Kevin > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> ----- > >>> To unsubscribe send a message to: svg-developers- > >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>> -or- > >>> visit http://groups.yahoo.com/group/svg-developers and > > click "edit > >>> my membership" > >>> ---- > >>> Yahoo! Groups Links > >>> > >>> > >>> > >> > > > > > > > > > > ----- > > To unsubscribe send a message to: svg-developers- > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -or- > > visit http://groups.yahoo.com/group/svg-developers and click "edit > > my membership" > > ---- > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > > ----- To unsubscribe send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -or- visit http://groups.yahoo.com/group/svg-developers and click "edit my membership" ---- Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/svg-developers/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/svg-developers/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
