On Wed, Mar 07, 2018 at 02:53:49PM -0800, Eitan Adler wrote: > On 7 March 2018 at 09:37, John Baldwin <[email protected]> wrote: > > ... > > I suspect many of these changes for iwm, etc. are all intertwined > > so I'm not sure if you can leave out individual ones. > > Possibly. I do have iwm working on my laptop though. I also know of > one open PR assigned to me w.r.t. a model I don't own. I'll be > addressing it some time this week.
I often have mixed feelings when I see lots of similar changes (i.e. that make up for better hardware support, esp. on a laptop) MFCed. I'd rather see laptop users run -CURRENT and leave -STABLE branches for very conservative (server?) users who can't/don't want to afford the risks of running -CURRENT or require ABI stability in a really long run, rather than binge-merging things. :-) By default it should be -CURRENT all over; it's a very good thing that we as a Project ourselves are doing this as part of our own dogfood eating strategy. ./danfe _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-all To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
