On Thu, Mar 8, 2018 at 12:51 PM, Pintér, Olivér <oliver.pin...@balabit.com>
wrote:

>
>
> On Thu, Mar 8, 2018 at 12:18 AM, Rodney W. Grimes <
> free...@pdx.rh.cn85.dnsmgr.net> wrote:
>
>> > On 7 March 2018 at 09:37, John Baldwin <j...@freebsd.org> wrote:
>> > > On Tuesday, March 06, 2018 06:46:37 PM Eitan Adler wrote:
>> > >> On 6 March 2018 at 08:26, John Baldwin <j...@freebsd.org> wrote:
>> > >> > On Monday, March 05, 2018 07:13:59 PM Eitan Adler wrote:
>> > >> >> On 5 March 2018 at 10:08, John Baldwin <j...@freebsd.org> wrote:
>> > >> >> > On Monday, March 05, 2018 07:54:58 AM Eitan Adler wrote:
>> > >> >> >> Author: eadler
>> > >> >> >> Date: Mon Mar  5 07:54:57 2018
>> > >> >> >> New Revision: 330451
>> > >> >> >> URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/330451
>> > >> >> >>
>> > >> >> >> Log:
>> > >> >> >>   MFC r306837:
>> > >> >> >>
>> > >> >> >>   [net80211] extend the ieee80211_rx_stats struct to include
>> more information.
>> > >> >> >
>> > >> >> > Have you thought about the KBI implications of this change and
>> some of the
>> > >> >> > other changes you've merged?
>> > >> >>
>> > >> >> I do have a copy of the modules from 11.1 and have loaded them at
>> > >> >> various points in time after merging. That said, I am not perfect.
>> > >> >> Unfortunately, my -STABLE box did not have fully functioning
>> drivers
>> > >> >> before these changes so its difficult to test anything beyond
>> "loads
>> > >> >> and does not panic.". I havn't done so today yet, but that will
>> happen
>> > >> >> soon.
>> > >> >>
>> > >> >> Ensuring these things work through code inspection is certainly
>> > >> >> possible and I've skipped over several changes as a result.
>> > >> >
>> > >> > Loading a module doesn't alone doesn't actually test for breakage.
>> > >>
>> > >> I'm aware. In this case I should likely just revert this change since
>> > >> its a pretty blatant break.
>> > >
>> > > I suspect many of these changes for iwm, etc. are all intertwined so
>> I'm not
>> > > sure if you can leave out individual ones.
>> >
>> > Possibly. I do have iwm working on my laptop though. I also know of
>> > one open PR assigned to me w.r.t. a model I don't own. I'll be
>> > addressing it some time this week.
>>
>> I believe I also have a tester of stable/11 iwm patches avaliable,
>> he has an 8265?
>>
>
> At weekend I will test them.
>

Sorry, -ENOTIME for 8265 this weekend, but it working fine (and much more
stable) with 7260.


>
>
>>
>> --
>> Rod Grimes
>> rgri...@freebsd.org
>> _______________________________________________
>> svn-src-stable...@freebsd.org mailing list
>> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-stable-11
>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-stable-11-unsubscribe
>> @freebsd.org"
>>
>
>
_______________________________________________
svn-src-all@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-all
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-all-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Reply via email to