> On Thu, Mar 8, 2018 at 12:51 PM, Pint?r, Oliv?r <oliver.pin...@balabit.com>
> wrote:
> 
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 8, 2018 at 12:18 AM, Rodney W. Grimes <
> > free...@pdx.rh.cn85.dnsmgr.net> wrote:
> >
> >> > On 7 March 2018 at 09:37, John Baldwin <j...@freebsd.org> wrote:
> >> > > On Tuesday, March 06, 2018 06:46:37 PM Eitan Adler wrote:
> >> > >> On 6 March 2018 at 08:26, John Baldwin <j...@freebsd.org> wrote:
> >> > >> > On Monday, March 05, 2018 07:13:59 PM Eitan Adler wrote:
> >> > >> >> On 5 March 2018 at 10:08, John Baldwin <j...@freebsd.org> wrote:
> >> > >> >> > On Monday, March 05, 2018 07:54:58 AM Eitan Adler wrote:
> >> > >> >> >> Author: eadler
> >> > >> >> >> Date: Mon Mar  5 07:54:57 2018
> >> > >> >> >> New Revision: 330451
> >> > >> >> >> URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/330451
> >> > >> >> >>
> >> > >> >> >> Log:
> >> > >> >> >>   MFC r306837:
> >> > >> >> >>
> >> > >> >> >>   [net80211] extend the ieee80211_rx_stats struct to include
> >> more information.
> >> > >> >> >
> >> > >> >> > Have you thought about the KBI implications of this change and
> >> some of the
> >> > >> >> > other changes you've merged?
> >> > >> >>
> >> > >> >> I do have a copy of the modules from 11.1 and have loaded them at
> >> > >> >> various points in time after merging. That said, I am not perfect.
> >> > >> >> Unfortunately, my -STABLE box did not have fully functioning
> >> drivers
> >> > >> >> before these changes so its difficult to test anything beyond
> >> "loads
> >> > >> >> and does not panic.". I havn't done so today yet, but that will
> >> happen
> >> > >> >> soon.
> >> > >> >>
> >> > >> >> Ensuring these things work through code inspection is certainly
> >> > >> >> possible and I've skipped over several changes as a result.
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> > Loading a module doesn't alone doesn't actually test for breakage.
> >> > >>
> >> > >> I'm aware. In this case I should likely just revert this change since
> >> > >> its a pretty blatant break.
> >> > >
> >> > > I suspect many of these changes for iwm, etc. are all intertwined so
> >> I'm not
> >> > > sure if you can leave out individual ones.
> >> >
> >> > Possibly. I do have iwm working on my laptop though. I also know of
> >> > one open PR assigned to me w.r.t. a model I don't own. I'll be
> >> > addressing it some time this week.
> >>
> >> I believe I also have a tester of stable/11 iwm patches avaliable,
> >> he has an 8265?
               ^^^^  Its an 8565, my mistake.
> >>
> >
> > At weekend I will test them.
> >
> 
> Sorry, -ENOTIME for 8265 this weekend, but it working fine (and much more
> stable) with 7260.

Thanks for keeping us informed.

I am uncertain as to the state of iwm in stable/11, should the
Intel 8565ac work, or not?  I have exchanged an additional
round of email with the volunteer tester, he says he is
running an unmodified stable/11, now trying to find out if he
is updating that regular or not.  Hopefully we can have some
test results soon.

Thanks,
-- 
Rod Grimes                                                 rgri...@freebsd.org
_______________________________________________
svn-src-all@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-all
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-all-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Reply via email to