On Sunday, November 28, 2004, at 04:58 PM, Tim Bunce wrote:
I really like the way that CPAN goes from general to specific when naming a module.
Still doesn't seem like a good use for CPAN. Seems more like an argument for a hierarchical topic index of articles for existing channels.
Agreed. For example, the contents of GUI::considered_harmful were originally posted to Usenet; there's no need to mirror it on CPAN.
If you wanted to write a manpage on different ways to write modular interfaces in Perl, I think it would be sufficient to include a link.
http://groups.google.com/ groups?selm=1992Aug19.192513.28287%40news.eng.convex.com
-Simon
_______________________________________________ sw-design mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://metaperl.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sw-design
