Hi Tom - glad to hear it might be useful to you. I've noticed that only the POMs are published on Maven central, not the > full artifacts. Is this deliberate?
The full artifacts are there - they're just under the sub-modules (e.g. http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/com/atlassian/oai/swagger-request-validator-core/1.0.4/). I'll update the README so its a bit easier to find. I also noticed there's some work left to do validating specific string > formats. Would you be happy to accept a PR or two to add these? Please do - I would be more than happy to accept PRs (string format validation has been on my TODO list for a while). The only requirement is you'll need to sign a CLA (company policy) - details are in the project README. If that's not an option for you raise a ticket in the issue tracker and I'll try to find the time this week to look at it. Finally, any objection to me bumping up to the latest WireMock version > while I'm at it? None at all. Cheers, James On Monday, September 26, 2016 at 11:47:56 PM UTC+10, Tom Akehurst wrote: > > Thanks, this is exactly the kind of thing I'm looking for. Wish I'd found > this a week ago, as I've nearly finished writing my own impl :-( > > I've noticed that only the POMs are published on Maven central, not the > full artifacts. Is this deliberate? > > I also noticed there's some work left to do validating specific string > formats. Would you be happy to accept a PR or two to add these? > > Finally, any objection to me bumping up to the latest WireMock version > while I'm at it? > > Cheers, > Tom > > On Monday, September 26, 2016 at 1:03:57 AM UTC+1, James Navin wrote: >> >> I faced a similar situation and ended up writing my own. Its open source >> and available at >> https://bitbucket.org/atlassian/swagger-request-validator >> >> Its framework agnostic and has adapters for WireMock (as well as Rest >> Assured and Pact). >> >> Feel free to raise any issues you find on the issue tracker attached to >> the repo. >> >> On Tuesday, September 20, 2016 at 9:08:10 PM UTC+10, Tom Akehurst wrote: >>> >>> Hello! >>> >>> I'm trying to find a good way to implement the following use case: >>> I'm building a WireMock-based mock of a 3rd party API my project depends >>> on. I'd like to be able to write a suite of tests that can be run against >>> either the real API or the mock, where each HTTP request/response is >>> captured and validated against a Swagger spec. >>> >>> I realise swagger-inflector is capable of validating exchanges, but it >>> appears to be tied to a specific server-side stack (please correct me if >>> I'm wrong!). I'd like a library with a similar architecture to this one for >>> RAML, which works against its own HTTP model and has adapters for various >>> HTTP clients: https://github.com/nidi3/raml-tester. That way I can run >>> it client or server, pick my own client and adapt it to WireMock's request >>> log API. >>> >>> If such a library exists, please can somebody point me to it? >>> >>> If it doesn't there's a good chance I'll end up writing it, so my next >>> question (for core community members) is: Would this would be of interest >>> for community adoption? >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Tom >>> >> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Swagger" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
