Duh! Yeah, it would help if I looked in the right group! Will take a look at the CLA, but I wouldn't have thought it'd be a problem.
Cheers, Tom On Monday, September 26, 2016 at 11:52:08 PM UTC+1, James Navin wrote: > > Hi Tom - glad to hear it might be useful to you. > > I've noticed that only the POMs are published on Maven central, not the >> full artifacts. Is this deliberate? > > > The full artifacts are there - they're just under the sub-modules (e.g. > http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/com/atlassian/oai/swagger-request-validator-core/1.0.4/). > > I'll update the README so its a bit easier to find. > > I also noticed there's some work left to do validating specific string >> formats. Would you be happy to accept a PR or two to add these? > > > Please do - I would be more than happy to accept PRs (string format > validation has been on my TODO list for a while). The only requirement is > you'll need to sign a CLA (company policy) - details are in the project > README. If that's not an option for you raise a ticket in the issue tracker > and I'll try to find the time this week to look at it. > > Finally, any objection to me bumping up to the latest WireMock version >> while I'm at it? > > > None at all. > > Cheers, > > James > > On Monday, September 26, 2016 at 11:47:56 PM UTC+10, Tom Akehurst wrote: >> >> Thanks, this is exactly the kind of thing I'm looking for. Wish I'd found >> this a week ago, as I've nearly finished writing my own impl :-( >> >> I've noticed that only the POMs are published on Maven central, not the >> full artifacts. Is this deliberate? >> >> I also noticed there's some work left to do validating specific string >> formats. Would you be happy to accept a PR or two to add these? >> >> Finally, any objection to me bumping up to the latest WireMock version >> while I'm at it? >> >> Cheers, >> Tom >> >> On Monday, September 26, 2016 at 1:03:57 AM UTC+1, James Navin wrote: >>> >>> I faced a similar situation and ended up writing my own. Its open source >>> and available at >>> https://bitbucket.org/atlassian/swagger-request-validator >>> >>> Its framework agnostic and has adapters for WireMock (as well as Rest >>> Assured and Pact). >>> >>> Feel free to raise any issues you find on the issue tracker attached to >>> the repo. >>> >>> On Tuesday, September 20, 2016 at 9:08:10 PM UTC+10, Tom Akehurst wrote: >>>> >>>> Hello! >>>> >>>> I'm trying to find a good way to implement the following use case: >>>> I'm building a WireMock-based mock of a 3rd party API my project >>>> depends on. I'd like to be able to write a suite of tests that can be run >>>> against either the real API or the mock, where each HTTP request/response >>>> is captured and validated against a Swagger spec. >>>> >>>> I realise swagger-inflector is capable of validating exchanges, but it >>>> appears to be tied to a specific server-side stack (please correct me if >>>> I'm wrong!). I'd like a library with a similar architecture to this one >>>> for >>>> RAML, which works against its own HTTP model and has adapters for various >>>> HTTP clients: https://github.com/nidi3/raml-tester. That way I can run >>>> it client or server, pick my own client and adapt it to WireMock's request >>>> log API. >>>> >>>> If such a library exists, please can somebody point me to it? >>>> >>>> If it doesn't there's a good chance I'll end up writing it, so my next >>>> question (for core community members) is: Would this would be of interest >>>> for community adoption? >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Tom >>>> >>> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Swagger" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
