There is a potential problem with search engine indexing. My understanding is that Google's spider has Javascript enabled, so it may not index noscript content. I'm not certain of this. Perhaps someone else can clarify.
In any case, Google may be able to index your swf. If the majority of your swf is being read correctly, your solution would work even if Google doesn't see the noscript content. mab wrote: > I've come up with a candidate solution to this issue that is working > well in my particular case and I would like to present it as a > potential addition to SWFObject. > > In this solution, the alternate content element has a single > "noscript" child element. It is inside of this "noscript" element that > all of the real alternate content is placed. This is important because > if the browser has JavaScript enabled then it will ignore the contents > of the "noscript" element and so any images in there will not be > loaded. > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "SWFObject" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/swfobject?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
