@all: Thank you for the replies and the interesting discussion! @Geoff: Thank you for the very interesting link!
Would that (see quote below) force me to include the LICENSE or README when distributing SWFObject? I do not quite feel comfortable if I had to do so because my own project has its own LICENSE or README file. I would then either have to merge the files and make sure it is clear what part of LICENSE belongs to which part of the project or I would have to put SWFObject in a separate subdirectory to clarify the relation. I understand that one is usually required to distribute a copy of the license (the GPL is a good example), but my understanding is that with digital- distribution it is sufficient if I state what license it is together with a link to the full license text (as it is often done and you are doing it with the MIT License). The base question is: Can I integrate/ship the original swfobject.js without modification and without any other other accompanying files? Thanks in advance, kind regards, -Jens On 16 Apr., 05:28, Geoff Stearns <[email protected]> wrote: > See:http://hackerboss.com/get-rid-of-templates/ > > I think we should just adjust it to include a note about the project + > authors in the LICENSE or the README file. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "SWFObject" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/swfobject?hl=en.
