Dear Alex, thats why I put the 1.0 in quotes. I dont care if it is 0.9.x or 0.9.x.y.z or actually 1.0 I just had the experience that some bugs in 0.9.0 are already fixed in the git version. However, as normal, new ones where introduced. Were just interested in a new stable (read: non crashing) release which makes the features and fixes accessible. So its all about coordination J. To answer Chris question: We could use google code. Its free, its easy to use, provides a bug tracker and a wiki. However, I think Matthias should decide which way to go, since its basically his project. best regards Andy freundliche Grüße scireum GmbH
Andreas Haufler Geschäftsführer ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------- scireum GmbH, Friedrichstr. 8, 70736 Fellbach Tel: (0711) 69394632 - E-Mail: [email protected] Fax: (0711) 69394635 - Internet: http://www.scireum.de Geschäftsführer: Michael Haufler, Andreas Haufler Amtsgericht Stuttgart, HRB 732171 From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Dr. Alex Sheppard Sent: Wednesday, April 21, 2010 11:03 AM To: [email protected] Cc: Swftools Subject: Re: [Swftools-common] version 1.0? I read Andreas' post to mean 'Stable' as in Debian ... as in unchanging, rather than 'Stable' as in always works (Debian does well on both meanings, but the notion of unchanging is what they really refer to). He wants to test thoroughly and know what does / doesn't work, and know that those test results will still be valid next week, next month, ... But i may be crossing my wires. If my interpretation is correct, why not just pick the version 0.9.X as your 'stable' - why does it need to be 1.0?? Alex Dr. Alex Sheppard Mob: 0775 1074054 www.das-computer.co.uk Chris Pugh wrote: On 21 April 2010 08:30, filip sound <mailto:[email protected]> <[email protected]> wrote: well, i have to say thanks for your indirect answer to my quite simple question. my conclusion is that there is no next release planned for the next weeks. you could have had it easier. filip It stirred things up a bit though Filip didn't it? ;o) But I have to beg to differ with you slightly. The git repository *IS* the latest version. Stability is relative, surely? As you have stated, even the releases labeled 'stable version' don't play well with all systems. But hey, that goes for nearly all software, from Open Source to the big expensive guns. I can remember fighting ( on someone's behalf ) with their sparkling new purchase of 3dsMax from Autodesk. It point blank refused to behave on certain hardware under certain o/s, despite Autodesk's protestations to the contrary. Stable my eye!! Did they care? Did they ever! ;o) Quit grumbling. Enjoy what you have. I'm sure your next 'stable' release, which may or not work with 'your system' ( whatever that may be, ) and with lots of updated features and bug fixes which also may or may not work as intended, will be out very soon! Regards, Chris.
