Ok.. but maybe no longer under this particular thread. Filip is getting stressed! ;o)
Cheers, Chris. On 21 April 2010 13:06, Mark Lee <[email protected]> wrote: >>Nor further argument from yours truly. > > Can't say I'd like that Chris. I've got some excellent info from your > responses/arguments. > > > Mark > > ________________________________ > From: Chris Pugh <[email protected]> > To: Mark Lee <[email protected]> > Cc: Swftools <[email protected]> > Sent: Wed, April 21, 2010 7:53:05 AM > Subject: Re: [Swftools-common] version 1.0? > > On 21 April 2010 12:44, Mark Lee <[email protected]> wrote: >> Chris, don't get me wrong > > I wasn't actually. But I did miss of the qualifying *;o)* !! > >>... as basically I'm supporting your point about learning and contributing. >> (I've already offered to contribute translation of the technical info into >> user >> friendly language and am attempting to learn C++.) > > That makes two of us then! > >> However, there's a "but": car designers/makers, even if they do it for >> free, are pleased when non-engineers can get in, turn the switch and drive >> off without knowing about pistons and injectors. > > And usually complain when the car comes back in a wreck through user > mishandling ( Note to Self: quit with the jokes Chris.. ) > >> Most of us will only be able to pump gas, change wheels (hah!) > > Agreed - the latter is almost impossible when the wretched things have > been put on with a air gun. > >> and sometimes remember to check the oil and washer fluid. It's good that >> >a trucker can make some quick fixes when he's broken down but if he were >> to spend weeks on fixing rather than grabbing another truck while the >> expert >> does the fixing, he'd be not using time as productively as he could. Yeah, >> >just pay the expert. > > Understood. Point made and taken. Nor further argument from yours truly. > > Regards, > > > Chris. > >
