ok, i've started this discussion and i want to stop it now officially again
:)
i love you all, you all love each other, everyone is happy and knows what to
do.

have a nice day guys and enjoy your lifes!

peace,
  filip



On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 2:06 PM, Mark Lee <[email protected]>wrote:

> >Nor further argument from yours truly.
>
> Can't say I'd like that Chris. I've got some excellent info from your
> responses/arguments.
>
>
> Mark
>
> ------------------------------
> *From:* Chris Pugh <[email protected]>
> *To:* Mark Lee <[email protected]>
>
> *Cc:* Swftools <[email protected]>
> *Sent:* Wed, April 21, 2010 7:53:05 AM
>
> *Subject:* Re: [Swftools-common] version 1.0?
>
> On 21 April 2010 12:44, Mark Lee <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Chris, don't get me wrong
>
> I wasn't actually.  But I did miss of the qualifying *;o)* !!
>
> >... as basically I'm supporting your point about learning and
> contributing.
> > (I've already offered to contribute translation of the technical info
> into user
> > friendly language and am attempting to learn C++.)
>
> That makes two of us then!
>
> > However, there's a "but": car designers/makers, even if they do it for
> > free, are pleased when non-engineers can get in, turn the switch and
> drive
> > off without knowing about pistons and injectors.
>
> And usually complain when the car comes back in a wreck through user
> mishandling ( Note to Self: quit with the jokes Chris.. )
>
> > Most of us will only be able to pump gas, change wheels (hah!)
>
> Agreed - the latter is almost impossible when the wretched things have
> been put on with a air gun.
>
> > and sometimes remember to check the oil and washer fluid. It's good that
> >a trucker can make some quick fixes when he's broken down but if he were
> > to spend weeks on fixing rather than grabbing another truck while the
> expert
> > does the fixing, he'd be not using time as productively as he could.
> Yeah, >just pay the expert.
>
> Understood. Point made and taken.  Nor further argument from yours truly.
>
> Regards,
>
>
> Chris.
>
>

Reply via email to