I would have to agree with the statements below.  When we are asked which 
technology we use, we don't hide the fact we use SWFTools.  Granted we don't 
utilize the 'flipbook' viewers or anything of the sort but we definitely tell 
our enterprise customers what they are getting.  

 

As for Chris' suggestion for addressing feature requests from customers that is 
exactly what we do currently.  

 

[Paraphrasing]
Customer: " When I upload a PDF some drop shadows and other things don't 
display properly. "

Support: " This is most likely due to the fact that your PDF is using some 
blended transparencies that are not yet supported.  This is a known limitation 
of our current system.  We are always attempting to improve the system as 
quickly as we can... ramble on about how they can 'flatten' a PDF beforehand 
instead of preserving layers, etc. ... However, if you feel this is a critical 
feature you would like to have we can expedite development through the use of 
custom development services.

 

9 times out of 10 the feature they 'want' isn't that high up on their list and 
they learn to work within the limitations, which for us anyways, aren't that 
limiting at all.  Basically we run PDF2SWF on a three phase approach.  Once 
regularly, and if it fails, then with -O1 and if that fails -O2.  So we try to 
maximize the conversion this way.

 

Cheers,

 

Matt

P.S. As I get more and more comfortable with SWFTools I will become more and 
more active on the list.

 

From: swftools-common-bounces+matthew.richer=conceptshare....@nongnu.org 
[mailto:swftools-common-bounces+matthew.richer=conceptshare....@nongnu.org] On 
Behalf Of Aaron Hawryluk
Sent: Tuesday, April 20, 2010 8:38 PM
To: Swftools
Subject: Re: [Swftools-common] version 1.0?

 

snip

 

> SWFTools as well as PDF2SWF are amazing effort ts and more than good enough to

> encourage (??) many people to cross the boundary and initiate commercial 
> offering
> based on it.

.. and what would be even nicer, is, if they publicly acknowledged that fact,
rather than claiming otherwise!

Hearty agreement on this end. I did some contract work building scripts for a 
provider to run PDF2SWF solutions a while back, and they absolutely refused to 
give any of their clients any hint that they were using open source, going so 
far as to claim to client's faces it was a "proprietary" solution (yeah, 
right... well the scripts were proprietary anyway lol).

 

 


> My respect and appreciation to everyone involved.
> Can not thank enough!

Quite!

 

Ditto.

Reply via email to