>Nor further argument from yours truly. Can't say I'd like that Chris. I've got some excellent info from your responses/arguments.
Mark ________________________________ From: Chris Pugh <[email protected]> To: Mark Lee <[email protected]> Cc: Swftools <[email protected]> Sent: Wed, April 21, 2010 7:53:05 AM Subject: Re: [Swftools-common] version 1.0? On 21 April 2010 12:44, Mark Lee <[email protected]> wrote: > Chris, don't get me wrong I wasn't actually. But I did miss of the qualifying *;o)* !! >... as basically I'm supporting your point about learning and contributing. > (I've already offered to contribute translation of the technical info into > user > friendly language and am attempting to learn C++.) That makes two of us then! > However, there's a "but": car designers/makers, even if they do it for > free, are pleased when non-engineers can get in, turn the switch and drive > off without knowing about pistons and injectors. And usually complain when the car comes back in a wreck through user mishandling ( Note to Self: quit with the jokes Chris.. ) > Most of us will only be able to pump gas, change wheels (hah!) Agreed - the latter is almost impossible when the wretched things have been put on with a air gun. > and sometimes remember to check the oil and washer fluid. It's good that >a > trucker can make some quick fixes when he's broken down but if he were > to spend weeks on fixing rather than grabbing another truck while the expert > does the fixing, he'd be not using time as productively as he could. Yeah, > >just pay the expert. Understood. Point made and taken. Nor further argument from yours truly. Regards, Chris.
