(updating my evaluation of the first version of this proposal)
> > https://github.com/apple/swift-evolution/blob/master/proposals/0089-rename-string-reflection-init.md > > * What is your evaluation of the proposal? > +1, because: - I believe the default/generic "printing" initializer is not commonly used (at least, not on purpose). - The new argument label clearly indicates what the initializer does. - The "lossless" protocol will be a welcome addition for serialization/deserialization code, and it makes the replacement init(_:) API very clear in its behavior. > * Is the problem being addressed significant enough to warrant a > change to Swift? > Yes. > * Does this proposal fit well with the feel and direction of Swift? > Yes, it fits well with the API guidelines. > * If you have used other languages or libraries with a similar > feature, how do you feel that this proposal compares to those? > N/A > * How much effort did you put into your review? A glance, a quick > reading, or an in-depth study? > Reviewed the initial proposal, followed and participated in the ensuing discussion, and glanced at this second draft to remind myself of the final changes. - Jacob
_______________________________________________ swift-evolution mailing list [email protected] https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
