In this case not just "Serializable" but "StringSerializable", no?
On 05.06.2016 6:25, David Sweeris via swift-evolution wrote:
On Jun 4, 2016, at 15:46, Jacob Bandes-Storch via swift-evolution
<[email protected]> wrote:
- The "lossless" protocol will be a welcome addition for
serialization/deserialization code, and it makes the replacement init(_:) API very clear
in its behavior.
Speaking of which, would "Serializable" be a better name for the protocol? I
don't recall whether anyone's already asked.
- Dave Sweeris
_______________________________________________
swift-evolution mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
_______________________________________________
swift-evolution mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
