The issue I think is that it would open up serialisation for all sorts of formats, which is a much larger problem in itself, whereas this can just focus on a user-defined ‘lossless’ string.
Patrick > On 5 Jun 2016, at 1:25 PM, David Sweeris via swift-evolution > <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> On Jun 4, 2016, at 15:46, Jacob Bandes-Storch via swift-evolution >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> - The "lossless" protocol will be a welcome addition for >> serialization/deserialization code, and it makes the replacement init(_:) >> API very clear in its behavior. > > Speaking of which, would "Serializable" be a better name for the protocol? I > don't recall whether anyone's already asked. > > - Dave Sweeris > _______________________________________________ > swift-evolution mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution _______________________________________________ swift-evolution mailing list [email protected] https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
