Good point Sent from my iPhone
> On Jun 5, 2016, at 00:16, Patrick Smith <[email protected]> wrote: > > The issue I think is that it would open up serialisation for all sorts of > formats, which is a much larger problem in itself, whereas this can just > focus on a user-defined ‘lossless’ string. > > Patrick > >> On 5 Jun 2016, at 1:25 PM, David Sweeris via swift-evolution >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >>> On Jun 4, 2016, at 15:46, Jacob Bandes-Storch via swift-evolution >>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> - The "lossless" protocol will be a welcome addition for >>> serialization/deserialization code, and it makes the replacement init(_:) >>> API very clear in its behavior. >> >> Speaking of which, would "Serializable" be a better name for the protocol? I >> don't recall whether anyone's already asked. >> >> - Dave Sweeris >> _______________________________________________ >> swift-evolution mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution > _______________________________________________ swift-evolution mailing list [email protected] https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
