> On 22 Jun 2016, at 17:02, Brandon Knope <bkn...@me.com> wrote:
> 
> No it shows where your hand frequently is also

And you don’t think there is a correlation between where the frequently pressed 
keys are and where your hands are? If you were needing to press the \ key a 
lot, there would be a hotspot over it. Then you could say “look, I need to 
press this key a lot and it’s miles away from the other hotspot”. 

> 
> Brandon
> 
>> On Jun 22, 2016, at 12:01 PM, Jeremy Pereira 
>> <jeremy.j.pere...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>>> On 22 Jun 2016, at 16:41, Brandon Knope <bkn...@me.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> My point was not to argue for the removal of \. My point was that there is 
>>> a measurable way to test the usability of such a key
>> 
>> 
>> Your heat map doesn’t test the usability of a key, it tests the frequency 
>> with which it was pressed. The fact that there was no coloured blob on the 
>> backslash key just means you don’t use it very often.
>> 
>> 
>>> 
>>> Brandon
>>> 
>>>> On Jun 22, 2016, at 11:30 AM, Jeremy Pereira 
>>>> <jeremy.j.pere...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> I find it somewhat disturbing that we are now trying to base language 
>>>> design around the layout of a US English keyboard.
>>>> 
>>>> “\” on my keyboard (British Macbook Pro Retina) is right next to the 
>>>> return key. It’s also much closer to the parentheses characters than $ is 
>>>> and (if you assume we are going to replace parentheses with braces as was 
>>>> suggested upthread) right next to the brace keys. 
>>>> 
>>>> Anyway, your heat map evidence actually negates the argument. If it was a 
>>>> frequently used key, it would have a hot spot of its own. It’s not (I 
>>>> tried it on some random samples of my own code), so that implies it is not 
>>>> a key that is used very often, which further implies it *should* be a 
>>>> little out of the way.
>>>> 
>>>> *The* escape character for strings is “\”. Please let’s not introduce a 
>>>> second one.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>> On 22 Jun 2016, at 00:08, Brandon Knope via swift-evolution 
>>>>> <swift-evolution@swift.org> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> Actually… we can go pretty scientific on this sort of thing and heat map 
>>>>> keyboard usage to get a better picture of how “usable” this is.
>>>>> 
>>>>> I pasted a file that contains seven \’s in it and heat mapped it at 
>>>>> https://www.patrick-wied.at/projects/heatmap-keyboard/
>>>>> 
>>>>> Even *with* several \’s throughout my source file the majority of my key 
>>>>> presses take place much closer to the $ key than the \ key.
>>>>> 
>>>>> I think we can all argue about what is clearer or not, but I think for 
>>>>> the majority of us, the \ key is quite inconvenient compared to the keys 
>>>>> around where we type the most.
>>>>> 
>>>>> I also ran several of iOS 10’s sample code through the heat map and 
>>>>> continue to get pretty similar results: the \ is much further from the 
>>>>> hottest part of the keyboard than the ones closer to where your hand 
>>>>> usually rests.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Maybe this is flawed, but I think it is hard to argue that the \ is easy 
>>>>> to type when there are far more usable alternatives.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Brandon
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Jun 21, 2016, at 6:10 PM, Daniel Resnick via swift-evolution 
>>>>>> <swift-evolution@swift.org> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I also disagree for the same reasons that Gwynne and Brent mentioned: I 
>>>>>> find '\(...)' easy to read, fine to type, and consistent with other 
>>>>>> string escaping syntax.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 3:55 PM, Brent Royal-Gordon via swift-evolution 
>>>>>> <swift-evolution@swift.org> wrote:
>>>>>>> I find that typing \(var) is very disruptive to my typing flow. The 
>>>>>>> more I code in Swift, the more I like it, but every time I'm coding and 
>>>>>>> then have to hiccup while typing \ then ( causes me to be annoyed. I 
>>>>>>> know, it's minor, but it isn't a key combination that flows quickly.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> I would much rather have $() or perhaps ${} (like Groovy lang) or 
>>>>>>> perhaps @() to go along with other uses of @ throughout the language.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Even though I'm used to Perl's and Ruby's interpolation syntaxes, I 
>>>>>> immediately liked `\(…)`. It's parsimonious: Rather than taking a third 
>>>>>> character (besides \ and ") to mean something special in a string 
>>>>>> literal, it reuses one of the existing ones. There's no need to escape a 
>>>>>> character you wouldn't otherwise have to touch, or to think of another 
>>>>>> character as "magical" in a string. It fits nicely with the rest of the 
>>>>>> syntax, with `\` indicating a special construct and then `()` delimiting 
>>>>>> an expression, just as they do elsewhere in the language. It's an 
>>>>>> elegant solution to a problem traditionally solved inelegantly. It's 
>>>>>> very Swifty in that way.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> A shifted key, like $ or @, followed by another shifted key like (, 
>>>>>>> allows for a much faster flow and they are much closer to the home keys 
>>>>>>> than \ which is nearly as far from home keys as possible (and awkward).
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I don't have any trouble typing it personally. If you find yourself 
>>>>>> accidentally typing `\9` or `|(`, we could probably offer an error for 
>>>>>> the former or warning for the latter with a fix-it. But if you're 
>>>>>> complaining that it takes a tiny fraction of a second longer to type 
>>>>>> than `$(` would, then honestly, I just can't bring myself to care. Swift 
>>>>>> optimizes for code reading. If we wanted to optimize for code typing 
>>>>>> instead, we'd have a very different style.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Brent Royal-Gordon
>>>>>> Architechies
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> swift-evolution mailing list
>>>>>> swift-evolution@swift.org
>>>>>> https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> swift-evolution mailing list
>>>>>> swift-evolution@swift.org
>>>>>> https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
>>>>> 
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> swift-evolution mailing list
>>>>> swift-evolution@swift.org
>>>>> https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
>>>> 
>>> 
>> 
> 

_______________________________________________
swift-evolution mailing list
swift-evolution@swift.org
https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution

Reply via email to