> 5. Given that many people agree there are two workflows (we ourselves had > talked about this a lot when writing the proposal, but didn't put it in), we > felt it makes sense to consider adding that as an explicit declaration > *somewhere*. > > @Eloy, @Orta: Suppose we had a semantic notion of which packages were > intended to be "top-level" versus used as a dependency, and we chose our > defaults accordingly (in this case, we would orient workflows towards pinning > by default in the top-level case, in the used as a dependency case we would > orient away from it, e.g. warning you if you checked it in). What would you > think of such a design?
Oooooooh, I like it. Even though I would probably still pin/lock personally, I think this default combined with the explicit declaration strikes a perfect balance in trade-offs 👍 _______________________________________________ swift-evolution mailing list swift-evolution@swift.org https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
