> 5. Given that many people agree there are two workflows (we ourselves had 
> talked about this a lot when writing the proposal, but didn't put it in), we 
> felt it makes sense to consider adding that as an explicit declaration 
> *somewhere*.
> @Eloy, @Orta: Suppose we had a semantic notion of which packages were 
> intended to be "top-level" versus used as a dependency, and we chose our 
> defaults accordingly (in this case, we would orient workflows towards pinning 
> by default in the top-level case, in the used as a dependency case we would 
> orient away from it, e.g. warning you if you checked it in). What would you 
> think of such a design?

Oooooooh, I like it.

Even though I would probably still pin/lock personally, I think this default 
combined with the explicit declaration strikes a perfect balance in trade-offs 👍
swift-evolution mailing list

Reply via email to