On Wed, 3 Feb 2021 08:36:30 GMT, Matthias Perktold <github.com+7334069+mperkt...@openjdk.org> wrote:
> > > > I think we should hard-code 96. Does JDK treat 93/94/95 differently? Does > > it change font size in any other place but CSS with W3C_LENGTH_UNITS? > > But isn't that precesily the only situation in which the old length mappings > were correct already? AFAIU, this wouldn't really test the fix, but only > ensure that the old behavior is preserved were it was correct already. > Then again, that could be enough, or I could be wrong. > > Anyway, let's say I really want to hardcode 96. > How can I do that? That test was added to test the past CSS mapping "JDK-4765271 Mapping of the CSS length units is incorrect " so I guess we can take care of hardcoding the existing test to preserve old behaviour. You dont need to change anything. ------------- PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/2256
