A search of the PS source code for "¶" reveals no hits. Search of the 
current libsword that PS uses also reveals no hits. I believe PS only shows 
pilcrows for those modules that have them inside, such as KJV.
FYI, there is a fun comment in our display code that says:

                                // paragraphing can be annoying, as different 
module creators can do things differently!

And it sums up my thoughts with paragraphs in the filter code & individual 
modules...  ;)
I'm about to do a new release of PS that tries to clean up the rather messy 
paragraphing in some certain modules (such as the ESV!)... [It's just been 
submitted & so hopefully will be live within a week?]

For example, it is not uncommon to find the following 3 situations in the 
produced HTML that the filters give me:

"<br /> <!P><br /><br />"
or
"<br /><!P><br /><br />"
or
"<br /> <!P><br /><!P><br />"

*sigh*

On 15/12/2012, at 12:34 AM, Karl Kleinpaste <k...@kleinpaste.org> wrote:

> I think it's pretty clear that all of this sort of processing belongs in
> the filter, not in the apps at all, and that if pilcrows (&para;) are
> desired, they too should be part of the filter-provided stream.
> 
> Do other apps generate pilcrows, or is this a GnomeSword/Xiphos-specific
> oddity?
> 
> _______________________________________________
> sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org
> http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel
> Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page


_______________________________________________
sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org
http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel
Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page

Reply via email to