Peter Von Kaehne wrote: > https://www.openhub.net/orgs/crosswire > This gives a decent overview of ongoing activity. Phooey. Its "decent overview" thinks Xiphos came into existence in 2009 and is written in Scheme, and I can't find a way to look at the other 5 of its 6 reviews. I am unconvinced I can trust anything else it says, either.
DM wrote: > Bible Desktop is very much alive on that criteria alone. Many, many > downloads every month. Likewise Xiphos. Thousands of downloads, and that's just the source tarball and Win32 installer; there is no way to track RPM installs, but given that Fedora users get it automatically and Win32 users have to look for it manually, I presume that RPM installs are substantially higher than Win32. Troy wrote: > It's not that I don't want active development. Sure, adding new > features is great. But just because an app hasn't been released in > ages doesn't mean it should be removed from our app list. Yes, but you're one of the reasons I asked. "It seems Xiphos is the only actively developed SWORD frontend these days" in #xiphos on 14 Jan. Similar things were muttered at me a couple days ago, hence my question here. I'm not looking to get anything knocked off any list. That said, it would be nice if folks would update the Choosing page <http://www.crosswire.org/wiki/Choosing_a_SWORD_program> once in several blue moons. There are many areas yet unfilled, and quite a number of recently-created or -updated categories that have gone blank.
_______________________________________________ sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page
