I think the whole Symfony community is glad to hear you enjoyed yourself

Good luck in learning Symfony and some social skills

RTFM next time


On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 5:54 PM, Joe Kelsey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>
> I find the YAML web site has wonderful, detailed documentation that
> very quickly and explicitly explains everything that anyone needs to
> know about YAML.  I really enjoyed reading the spec.
>
> /Joe
>
> On Apr 9, 12:06 pm, "Alistair Stead" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > Joe,
> > Just to save you finding another tools documentation less then useful.
> The
> > YAML website will simply explain how YAML can be used as a configuration
> > tool. That site will contain very little help when it comes to your
> specific
> > problems of implementation.
> >
> > I would suggest that the wiki, snippets, forums, and other developers
> blogs
> > would be a better starting point. There is an abundance of information
> out
> > there... But an individual developer needs to take some responsibility
> for
> > holes in their own knowledge. Rather than berating the developers who
> have
> > invested a large amount of time in producing the symfony project and
> making
> > if freely available, maybe you could read the book and updated
> documentation
> > online.... then maybe after that you will feel better informed?
> >
> > I only feel the need to comment as I read the developer list so that I
> can
> > better understand the symfony project as it develops through its release
> but
> > your constant bickering is driving me and I'm sure a number of other
> > to despair..
> >
> > This isn't François by the way
> >
> > On 09/04/2008, Joe Kelsey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > > Thank you for the reference.  The lack of indexing and other search
> > > terms is very frustrating.
> >
> > > I have only received the printed book last week and am going through
> > > it slowly.
> >
> > > The online documentation is only as good as the indexing can make it.
> > > The lack of an index is very frustrating.  I searched for "fixtures"
> > > and "fixtures.yml" and only came across the reference in unit test
> > > chapter.  I will now go to the yaml web site and read there.
> >
> > > I am not intentionally trying to be rude.  I simply write facts down.
> > > If you insist on taking offense to the simple presentation of facts,
> > > then you need to adjust your attitude.  My personal attitude is that I
> > > am trying to use a reasonable tool that has some small problems that
> > > the developers apparantly cannot see.
> >
> > > /Joe
> >
> > > On Apr 9, 9:54 am, "Francois Zaninotto" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > > project.com> wrote:
> > > > Dear Joe,
> >
> > > > Did you read pages 358-361 (Chapter 16) of the symfony book? There
> is a
> > > > subsection called 'using linked tables' there, which pretty much
> > > explains
> > > > the way to reference another record in a fixture file.
> >
> > > > Now I know what you're going to say: there is no trace of this
> section
> > > in
> > > > the index, and the book is very badly written, and your bug is still
> not
> > > > fixed. Perhaps you're wondering if all the people who send posts to
> the
> > > > symfony mailing-list and forum are not fake people, since the
> framework
> > > > simply doesn't work at all. There is no way thousands of people
> could
> > > build
> > > > symfony applications with such a lousy product.
> >
> > > > I'll tell you what: you are right. There is no such thing as the
> symfony
> > > > framework. I write all the posts myself (I have a lot of different
> > > > identities).
> >
> > > > I just do that to make fun of people. They look so funny when they
> start
> > > > reading the fake book, and realize that this framework stuff is just
> a
> > > con.
> > > > I know, this is pathetic.
> >
> > > > When they realize that, people stop trying with symfony and simply
> > > switch to
> > > > Code Ignitor, which is much better. Perhaps you shoud give it a try?
> >
> > > > Cheers,
> >
> > > > François
> >
> > > > 2008/4/9, Joe Kelsey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> > > > > On Apr 5, 12:02 am, Fabien POTENCIER <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > project.com> wrote:
> >
> > > > > > The bug IS fixed.
> >
> > > > > The bug is NOT fixed.
> >
> > > > > > The fixture file takes class names as main keys, not table
> names.
> > > But
> > > > > > I'm sure you already know that as it's well described in the
> symfony
> > > > > book.
> >
> > > > > There is no documentation on fixtures anywhere in the symfony book
> > > > > EXCEPT for a small section in the testing chapter which describes
> > > > > using fixtures.yml to load arbitrary unit-test data.  At least,
> there
> > > > > is no reference to fixtures.yml in the Index except for the
> reference
> > > > > to unit-test data.  Specifically, I cannot find any references to
> > > > > fixtures.yml that specifically describes using names instead of
> > > > > indexes for key values.
> >
> > > > > > If you think there is still a bug, please open a new ticket,
> > > describe
> > > > > > the problem, attach a patch that fixes the problem with unit
> tests
> > > that
> > > > > > prove the patch, and prepend the ticket description with
> [PATCH].
> >
> > > > > You can demonstrate the bug by simply installing the sfGuardPlugin
> in
> > > > > a NEW project, and attempt to build a database and load the
> fixture.
> > > > > The load will fail.
> >
> > > > > > The core team read all tickets as they are created. My first
> reply
> > > to
> > > > > > the ticket was exactly 35 minutes after the ticket creation! And
> the
> > > fix
> > > > > > was commited less than 24 hours later.
> >
> > > > > I submitted ticket 3291.  There is no evidence that anyone else
> has
> > > > > ever looked at it.
> >
> > > > > /Joe
> >
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"symfony developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/symfony-devs?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to