Filip Dominec wrote: >> Alternatively we may leave sympify untouched and use 'simple()' >> instead of 'simplify()'. I write this function quite often and every >> byte counts.
But that would be misleading since the function has nothing to do with making things simple. It makes them into sympy object. Shortening to sympy won't work. sympyfy is ok but it looses the pythonic cuteness (IMO). What about sympyit? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sympy?hl=en.
