Hello, sympyit looks very good. It sounns like "to sympy something".
Best regards. Christophe 2010/12/9 Chris Smith <[email protected]> > Filip Dominec wrote: > >> Alternatively we may leave sympify untouched and use 'simple()' > >> instead of 'simplify()'. I write this function quite often and every > >> byte counts. > > But that would be misleading since the function has nothing to do with > making things simple. It makes them into sympy object. Shortening to sympy > won't work. sympyfy is ok but it looses the pythonic cuteness (IMO). What > about sympyit? > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "sympy" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected] <sympy%[email protected]>. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/sympy?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sympy?hl=en.
