On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 10:07 AM, Aaron Meurer <[email protected]> wrote: > From my understanding, it's easiest to do this if we don't support Python > 3.2, and even easier if we don't support Python 2.6 (but we should continue > to support 2.6 for a while). > > I am -1 to this, just because we already have 2to3 working, and so we should > not waste our time fixing what isn't broken.
It's not a big deal now, so we can revisit this later. I posted it here to think about this. That being said, I can see many things that are broken, for example: * we need to ship the same tarball for Python 3.2 and 3.3 (and keep adding tarballs for higher version of Python) so that pip installs it * that we cannot ship just one tarball for all Python versions * that installing sympy (from git) into Python 3 takes a long time * If you want to hack using Python 3 (that implies in git), you can't. The only way is to hack in Python 2.7 and keep translating to Python 3. In fact the translation takes such a long time on my laptop, that I don't use Python 3 with sympy and git. It's nice to use the released tarball in Python 3 though, that works great. Ondrej -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sympy. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
